From KERA News:
A Dallas County district judge dismissed Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit against the State Fair of Texas and the city of Dallas over the State Fair’s gun policy enacted at last year’s fair.
In a June 24 ruling, Judge Emily Tobolowsky granted the city and State Fair’s motions for summary judgment in their favor, or a decision without a full trial. Tobolowsky did not provide any reasoning for her decision in court documents.
Karissa Condoianis, a spokesperson for the State Fair, told KERA News organizers are pleased with the court’s ruling.
“The State Fair takes no political position on the complex issues related to the lawful carrying of firearms in Texas, and in fact has been and continues to be a strong supporter of the right of responsible gun owners in Texas,” Condoianis said. “The State Fair’s No. 1 priority is the safety of our fairgoers, vendors, volunteers and staff, and we will continue to work with the Dallas Police Department to create a safe and secure environment.”
The fair will keep its current gun policy in place for this year’s fair, Condoianis said. She added the fair is grateful for the resolution of Cameron Turner’s criminal case.
Turner, who injured three people in a shooting at the fair that prompted the new gun policy and Paxton’s lawsuit, pleaded guilty last week to aggravated assault and illegally carrying a gun at the fair.
KERA News reached out to the City of Dallas and the attorney general’s office for comment and will update this story with any response.
The fair’s decision to ban all firearms from the event — excluding elected, appointed or employed peace officers — drew criticism from Republican lawmakers, gun rights groups like the National Rifle Association, and later, Paxton with his suit.
During a February hearing, attorneys for the state once again argued Dallas officials took action through fair organizers to ban guns at Fair Park — which is owned by the city and leased to the State Fair of Texas organization — in violation of the Texas Government Code.
State attorneys also argued the gun policy violates the state’s constitutional right to carry. Two licensed gun owners and one unlicensed gun owner joined as additional plaintiffs in the lawsuit to argue the same.











