From KUT News:
When Ashley Morgan decided to go to law school, it was uncharted territory for her family.
“I’m the first lawyer in my family,” the 35-year-old said. “My parents don’t have four-year degrees. Most of the people in my family are ranchers, teachers or some kind of entrepreneur or work for the railroad.”
Even with the help of scholarships, Morgan said, she could not have afforded college or law school without taking out student loans.
“I lived off student loans for eight years while going to school,” she said.
Morgan is now a trial attorney with an office in downtown Austin. But, these days, she’s questioning whether the cost of pursuing a law degree was worth it.
Morgan said she took on federal student loans with the understanding that she’d be able to pay them back based on her income – something she’s been doing for the last eight years.
But when it was time for her to recertify her income, she couldn’t. The U.S. Department of Education, which President Trump wants to dismantle, had removed the forms for income-driven repayment (IDR) plans just days before her March 1 deadline. Without this option, her monthly payments will skyrocket from $507 to $2,464. The current balance for her federal student loans is just over $255,000.
“When I logged in and I saw that my payments were going to go up in April to over $2,400 a month, my stomach dropped and I just started bawling,” she said. “I didn’t know what I was going to do.”
The discovery filled her with self-doubt.
“Since I found out about this, I second-guessed myself and whether or not a middle-class person even deserves to get to go to law school,” she said. “Because I thought that if you worked hard at your education and put in the time and the effort that it would pay off.”
Student debt relief program blocked
Morgan is one of millions of borrowers facing uncertainty after a federal appeals court upheld a ruling that blocked a Biden-era student loan repayment plan. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with seven Republican-led states that challenged the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan.
The Feb. 18 ruling has had a ripple effect on other income-driven repayment plans, said Victoria Jackson, assistant director of higher education policy at EdTrust. The group advocates for policies to remove racial and economic barriers within education.