Texas public school boards and charter school governing bodies have until March 1 to decide whether to set aside time for students and faculty to pray or read the Bible. That’s according to a law passed last year as Senate Bill 11.
Texas faith leaders both for and against the law are lobbying school boards as the deadline approaches.
Pastor Hernan Castano said he believes strongly in the power of prayer to heal people. Speaking at Iglesia Rios De Aceite in west Houston, where he is the senior pastor, he said it’s important for parents and churches to take the lead in teaching children about prayer, but he said schools also have a role to play.
“We’ve seen how children have lost their sense of direction, how much violence has gone to the schools,” Castano said. “And I think people need to realize that this wasn’t the case when prayer was back in the schools before it got taken away. We need to get prayer back into school.”
Castano recently became director of the Houston Area Pastor Council. He and his colleagues are looking ahead toward the March 1 deadline.
“We’re sending out letters. We’re expressing our concerns if this doesn’t go through, and we’re also expressing the importance of this going through and how the entire community wants this to go through,” Castano said.
The lead sponsor of SB 11 in the Texas House was Republican state Rep. David Spiller, who represents a 12- county district west of Fort Worth. Before he was elected to the Legislature, he served 26 years as a school board member.
“I’d heard from a lot of constituents that they felt like, over the years, the opportunity for students and employees in schools to participate in voluntary prayer or reading of the Bible or other religious texts, that those things had deteriorated, their rights had deteriorated over a period of time,” Spiller said.
Spiller said the way the Texas Education Code was written before SB 11, students could only pray in school silently, not openly. He stressed the new law is written in such a way as to make participation voluntary at all levels.
“First of all, the school district has to say, ‘Are we going to participate in this, or are we not?’ If they don’t, the end of story,” Spiller said. “If they do, then they provide a place outside the instructional time period for students and staff at each campus to do this on a daily basis.”
The cornerstone of the bill, Spiller said, is that the schools must get the consent of participants, in the case of school staff, or their parents in the case of students.
“It is specifically designed to not be in contact with or earshot of anyone that chooses not to participate, and so their safeguards are in there, and this bill is carefully drafted to respect everyone’s rights,” Spiller said, “whether you choose to participate or whether you don’t.”












