After a Few Failed Attempts, A New Pitch for Nuclear Waste in West Texas

Ranchers don’t like the idea, and they’re already gearing up for a fight.

By Travis BubenikJune 29, 2015 7:48 am

This story originally appeared on Marfa Public Radio

Bill Jones is a Texas Parks and Wildlife Commissioner. He’s also co-owner of the Austin-based company AFCI, Texas. In that role, he wants to bring used nuclear fuel from those power plants to an above-ground storage site in rural Culberson County.

But he’s been trying to do that for seven years. Even with supporters as powerful as former governor Rick Perry backing the idea of bringing nuclear waste to Texas, it’s still been a hard sell.

Four other West Texas counties have already told him, “no thanks.”

“It’s fair to say that we did not bring along the landowners with the process, as we have with this county,” Jones said at a recent community meeting in Van Horn.

There, he pitched the idea to locals and people from neighboring counties. He was grilled on the safety of it.

Later, he said it’s not like that Simpons-esque image people have of a nuclear site.

“Most have a Hollywood view of a green, goopy, highly-toxic material stored in 55-gallon drums with a skull and crossbones drawn on the drums,” he said, noting that won’t be the case with this project.

The waste would be stored in heavy-duty steel cylinders, the way it’s already stored at many of the plants that produce it.

“We are doing something that we are currently doing in this country very safely,” he said. “We’re just going to do it better, and in a remote location.”

The federal government has been looking for a community willing to take some of this waste off the power plants’ hands while the government tries to find a permanent place to put it.

It’s saved up billions of dollars in a Nuclear Waste Fund to pave the way.

If the people here go with his plan, Jones said, some of that money – possibly millions – could wind up in Texas and here in Culberson County.

“If they satisfy themselves with the safety of it, then I think it simply makes sense to explore the economic opportunities that come with it.”

His selling point to West Texans: if you don’t get in on this, New Mexico will.

Nearby counties there are looking at similar plan, as is the low-level waste site that already exists in Texas.

That pitch hasn’t convinced people in the past, but this time could be different. Jones now has a powerful ally.

Remember that landowner Jones mentioned he’s got a better relationship with this time around?

That’s his fellow commissioner and Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission Chairman Dan Allen Hughes, Jr. His family owns the land where this site would be built.

“I just don’t really see how nuclear waste and Texas Parks and Wildlife go together, but I don’t know,” said Lucy Furlong, a cattle rancher in Culberson and Jeff Davis Counties. Her family’s owned the Long X Ranch since the late 1800’s.

Old, grainy pictures of the ranch line the rustic walls of the main house.

She and her husband Clay say they didn’t know anything about nuclear waste until they found out just weeks ago that a site could be built a few miles up the road.

All they knew was how they felt about it: “horrified.”

Nearby ranchers aren’t happy either.

“We’ve gotten together as landowners just talking,” Furlong says. “No one wants it, we haven’t really had a meeting or anything.”

But at home, they’re thinking of what life might be like with that waste sitting nearby, possibly for a long time.

“They say it’s a storing facility, it seems like it’s gonna be for a very long time, 80 to 100 years, which we’ll all be dead then, who knows,” she said. “There’s caverns underground, water, we’re concerned about water, and the lights and the land value.”

Driving out to the proposed site, Clay Furlong points out an old railroad route Jones has talked about using to ship the waste in, but there aren’t any tracks on the ground. Just a dirt path, a sign that this plan’s still in its very early stages.

“There is a bit of a question mark here,” said Edwin Lyman, a Senior Scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists focused on the future of nuclear power.

He says, the fact is, any project like this is going to be entering uncharted territory. It’s just never been done before.

“There’s always going to be uncertainty around the potential safety of the site,” he explained. “A lot of the analysis is based on paper studies and computer models, and there’s very little real-world testing of the integrity of spent fuel waste casks.”

At that recent community meeting, Culberson County Judge Carlos Urias said he’s not closing the door on the plan, but that it will be the people of his county that decide what happens.

“We might take it to an election, maybe a survey,” he said. “We’ll do something that will gauge how the people feel, the residents of Culberson County, not any other county.”

But in a place where ranches cross county lines and next-door neighbors sometimes live miles away, that approach doesn’t sit well with everyone.

“They’re not worried about Jeff Davis or Reeves County, but Jeff Davis is just right beside it, so is Reeves, so there’s a lot of people that are concerned that they have no say so in it,” said Clay Furlong.

At least one of the Furlong’s neighboring ranchers opposed to the plan has already met with an attorney, and on an abandoned mercantile store the Furlongs own, there’s a graffiti reminder that the fight here’s just begun: “No Nuclear Waste Aquí.”

– Katherine Rae Mondo contributed reporting from Van Horn.