US Supreme Court weighs use of geofence warrants in light of Fourth Amendment claims

The court heard oral arguments this week in the case of a robbery suspect who was identified after police obtained cell phone location data for a number of people in the area of the crime.

By Shelly BrisbinApril 30, 2026 10:49 am,

When and how can police use cell phone location data to find a criminal suspect? And how much data about people who happen to be in the area can law enforcement scoop up at the same time?

Those questions are at the heart of a case before the Supreme Court this week. Tech expert Omar Gallaga wrote for CNET about the oral arguments before justices. 

Highlights from this segment:

– Police in Richmond, VA served a geofence warrant on Google, requesting location data for phones in the area of a bank robbery, which resulted in the loss of nearly $200,000. 

– By analyzing the data, police narrowed down the list of possible suspects, using subsequent warrants to gather further information.

– Based on the location data, police searched a suspect’s home and found nearly $100,000. The suspect claimed in court that the use of geofence data violated his Fourth Amendment rights.

If you found the reporting above valuable, please consider making a donation to support it here. Your gift helps pay for everything you find on texasstandard.org and KUT.org. Thanks for donating today.